Employee Discipline and Indiscipline

 

Employee Discipline & Indiscipline

Discipline

Discipline, implies orderly behaviour. It is the observance of rules and regulations. It means ensuring consistent behaviour in accordance with accepted standards of behaviour. Generally speaking, it is the absence of chaos, irregularity and confusion in the employee behaviour.

In the words of R. D. Calhoon, “Discipline is the force that prompts individuals or groups to observe rules, regulations, standards and procedures deemed necessary for an organisation.”

Without Discipline, from an organisation’s point of view, it is more possible to achieve goals, meet deadlines and fulfil promises.  (Mosley; Rodeken; Bryant, Harvey)

In the absence of strict disciplinary measures, employees can be habitually late for work, ignore safety procedures, act rude to customers or have unprofessional behaviour towards co-workers. In short, they may engage in behaviours that are intolerable and highly prohibitive. Of course, it is true that true Discipline is not just a matter of rules and regulations. Discipline is largely educational because it changes the very attitude of the workers towards their work and workplace. In short, Discipline must come from within.

 

MISCONDUCT OR INDISCIPLINE:

Misconduct is a violation of established rules and procedures. It is an act that violates the interests of the organisation. It is a serious form of indiscipline against management. The different forms of Indiscipline include:

a) Inconsistent behaviour of an employee and deviation from standard behaviour.

b) Unsafe employee behaviour.

c) Immoral action of the employee.

d) When the employee is abusive, disturbs the peace and is negligent with his duties.

 

COMMON DISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS:

 "A) Attendance-related problem:

1. Unexcused absence

2. Chronic absenteeism

3. Leaving without permission

4. Excessive tardiness

B) Dishonesty and related problems:

1. Theft, unsafe acts

2. Falsifying employment application

3. Wilfully damaging factory assets

4. Falsifying work records

C) Performance related problems:

1. Failure to complete assigned work

2. Producing substandard products

3. Failure to meet production norms

D) Off the Job behaviour problems:

1. Insubordination

2. Smoking

3. Fighting with colleagues

4. Gambling, betting

5. Carelessness

6. Using abusive language against supervisors

7. Accepting bribes, gifts"  (V.S.P. Rao)

 

CAUSES OF INDISCIPLINE:

For the most part, lack of cooperation results in Indiscipline. Various factors such as social, economic and cultural also play an important role in causing indiscipline. Henry Fayol observed that, “Discipline is what the leaders make it”. Many times Indiscipline is due to managerial faults, lapses, thoughtless words, deeds and mismanagement.

The common causes of Indiscipline are:

1. Absence of effective leadership: The absence of effective leadership results in poor management in the areas of direction, guidance, instructions, etc. This, in turn, leads to Indiscipline.

2. Unfair management practices: Management sometimes indulges in unfair practices such as wage discrimination, non-compliance with promotional and transfer policies, job assignment discrimination, faulty handling of complaints, low wages payments, delay in payment of wages, creating low quality work life, etc. These unfair management practices gradually result in Indiscipline.

3. Communication barriers: The communication barriers along with absence of upward communication, the absence of humane and understanding approach from superiors result in frustration and leads to Indiscipline.

4. Non-uniform disciplinary action: Management must treat all cases of Indiscipline fairly and equitably. But the management can take disciplinary actions in a discriminating way, leading to violent protests from various quarters.

5. Divide and rule policy: Managers can often divide the employees into groups, obtain information from different groups about each other and encourage the spying activities. Henri Fayol pointed out that dividing enemy forces to weaken them is clever, but dividing one’s own team is a grave sin against the business. Building a team is very difficult when compared to dividing the team. Dividing the team results in Indiscipline.

6. Inadequate attention to personnel problems and delay in resolving personnel problems creates frustration among individual workers.

7. Victimisation and excessive pressure on the subordinate’s work may also lead to Indiscipline.

 

DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND PROCEDURE:

Although there is no specific and rigid procedure for taking a disciplinary action, the disciplinary procedure followed in Indian industries usually consists of the following steps:

1. Issuing a letter of charge: When an employee commits an act of misconduct that requires disciplinary action, the employee in question should receive a charge sheet. Charges of misconduct or indiscipline should be clearly and precisely stated in the charge sheet. The charge sheet must also ask for an explanation for the said lawbreaking act and the employee must have enough time to respond.

2. Consideration of explanation: On getting the response to the submitted letter of charge sheet, the explanation provided will be considered and if it is satisfactory, no disciplinary action will be necessary. On the contrary when management is not satisfied with the employee’s explanation there is a need for serving a show-cause notice.

3. Show-cause notice: The manager issues Show-cause notice when he believes that there is sufficient prima facie evidence of employee’s misconduct. However, this gives the employee another opportunity to explain his misconduct and refute the charges made against him. The investigation should also be initiated by first providing him with an investigation notice that clearly states the name of the investigation officer, time, date and place of enquiry, etc.

4. Holding of a full-fledged enquiry: This must be in accordance with the principle of natural justice, that is, the employee in question must have the opportunity to be heard. When the investigation process is complete and the results of the investigation are recorded, the Enquiry Officer must suggest the nature of disciplinary action to be taken.

5. Making a final order of punishment: Disciplinary action will be taken when employee misconduct is proven. In deciding the nature of disciplinary action consideration should be given to the employee’s previous record, precedents, effects of disciplinary action on other employees, etc. When the employee considers that the enquiry carried out was not adequate and the action taken is not justified, he should have an opportunity to make an appeal.

6. Follow up: After taking the disciplinary action, appropriate follow up action must be taken and the consequences of implementing the disciplinary action must be noted and taken care of.

 

THE RED HOT STOVE RULE:

Without the continuous support of subordinates, no manager can get things done. But, disciplinary action against a lawbreaking employee is painful and generates dissatisfaction on his part. Hence, the question arises as to how to impose discipline without generating dissatisfaction? This is possible to what Douglas McGregor called the “Red Hot Stove Rule”, which draws a correlation between touching a hot stove and undergoing discipline.

According to the Red Hot Stove Rule, disciplinary action must have the following consequences:

1. Burns immediately: If disciplinary action is to be taken, it must occur immediately so the individual will understand the purpose for it. With the passage of time, people tend to convince themselves that they are not at fault.

2. Provides warning: It is very important to provide advance warning that punishment will follow unacceptable behaviour. As you move closer to a hot stove, you are warned by its heat that you will be burned if you touch it.

3. Gives consistent punishment: Disciplinary action must also be consistent in that everyone who performs the same act will be punished accordingly. As with a hot stove, each person who touches it is burned the same.

4. Burns impersonally: Disciplinary action must be impersonal. There are no favourites when this approach is followed.



References:
1. Rao, V S P, (2010). “Human Resource Management Text and Cases”, 3rd ed., Excel Books, New Delhi.
2. D.C. Mosley et al., "Supervisory Management", Cincinnati: South Western, 1997.
3. J. Rodeken, "Employee Discipline", Washington, Bureau of National Affairs, 1989.
4. A. W. Bryant, "Replacing punitive discipline with a positive approach", Personnel Administrator, 29, 1984.
5. E. L. Harvey, "Discipline vs. Punishment", Management Review, 76, 1987.

Post a Comment

0 Comments